Note: GJAT adopts Double-Anonymous (Double-Blind) Peer Review
Every article submitted to GJAT will be subjected to the following steps and review processes:
- Notification: GJAT receives an article submission from an author. Author is notified.
- Technical Review: Article is assessed whether it fits the journal's aims and scope, and fulfills journal's technical and formatting requirements.
- Language Review: GJAT ascertains if article meets standard language quality and requirement.
- Content Review: Content Review is a screening process to determined the academic quality and acceptability of the content of the article and determination is made on whether the article is publishable by SCOPUS standard.
- Expert Review: Subsequent to the Content Review, article is subjected to a review by two (2) expert peer reviewers, pre-selected by GJAT, or recommended by author. Expert reviewers will make suggestions and recommendations on whether to publish or reject the article, or request author to make necessary amendments to the article.
- All peer reviewers must have established expertise in relevant fields and disciplines relating to the article.
- Reviewers must not be part of the authorship of any given article.
- At each step and at any point of the review process, author will be notified of the rejection of article where applicable.
- Author will make all necessary changes and amendments to the article where/when required, and return it to GJAT either as a resubmission or a continuance of the review process.
- GJAT Editorial will deliberate on the publication of every article submitted to GJAT. Author will be notified accordingly.
Peer Review & Publication Flow Chart